~1M-token context
Public materials cite up to ~1M input tokens—whole repos, long specs, and agent threads with less chunking.
Claude Opus 4.6
~1M context and 128K output with effort tiers and prompt caching—run large codebases, long specs, and multi-step agents in LimaxAI alongside GPT, Gemini, and more.

Capabilities & limits
Key specs for production planning; exact toggles follow what LimaxAI exposes in chat.
Public materials cite up to ~1M input tokens—whole repos, long specs, and agent threads with less chunking.
Up to ~128K output tokens for long reports, full patches, and large structured deliverables.
Adjustable effort (e.g. low / medium / high) to trade latency, cost, and reasoning depth (per integration).
Function calling, computer-use class capabilities, and multi-step agent loops for dev and ops automation.
Images plus text out for UI review, charts, and document Q&A (per chat attachments).
Cache repeated system prompts, tool schemas, and long prefixes to cut cost on hot agent and IDE paths (API; chat per product).
Use cases
Aligned with public Claude Opus 4.6 positioning; images are illustrative.

Cross-file refactors, deep debugging, architecture review, and large PR summaries with full context in one thread.

Search–execute–edit–verify loops for dev automation, data cleanup, and runbooks (per chat tools).

Contracts, papers, logs, and spec-sized material in one session—less manual splitting and context loss.
Why LimaxAI
Same chat workspace as GPT, Gemini, and DeepSeek—no separate Anthropic console.
Route hard work to Opus; shift everyday chat to Sonnet in the same credits system.
Bill against LimaxAI points rules for straightforward team comparisons.
Same streaming pipeline as other chat models for long replies and agent iteration.
Claude family
Opus 4.6 targets frontier quality; compare Opus 4.7 for the newest generation; Sonnet for cost-sensitive daily use.
Public specs evolve; available entries follow LimaxAI’s model list.
| Dimension | Opus 4.6 | Opus 4.7 | Sonnet |
|---|---|---|---|
| Positioning | Frontier · coding & agents | Newer Opus gen | Balanced · daily |
| Context | ~1M | ~1M | Varies by release |
| Max output | 128K | 128K | Varies |
| Typical tasks | Hard coding · long agents | Hardest frontier work | High-throughput chat |
| Pick when | Quality & long context first | Want newest Opus | Cost & speed first |
Get started
Try Claude Opus 4.6 in LimaxAI chat.
Open Chat and find Claude Opus 4.6 (or a similarly named entry) in the model list.
Start with code review, long-document Q&A, or a short agent prompt and check quality vs latency.
Escalate outliers to Opus 4.7, keep daily traffic on Sonnet, and check pricing for credits.
FAQ
Public materials position 4.7 as the newer Opus generation with stronger reasoning and agents; 4.6 remains a mature frontier tier. What LimaxAI lists is authoritative.
Public specs cite ~1M input and up to ~128K output. Limits in chat follow LimaxAI’s model list and gateway policy.
Effort trades reasoning depth, latency, and cost (e.g. low / medium / high). Whether chat exposes the control depends on the product.
APIs often use identifiers like claude-opus-4-6. In LimaxAI Chat, pick the matching list entry—names may change with ops config.
Use Opus for hard coding, long agents, and tough reasoning; Sonnet for cost-sensitive, high-throughput everyday chat.
Yes in public API materials for repeated prefixes; chat behavior follows LimaxAI product docs.
Per selected chat model and published points rules—see pricing and your usage history.
Try in LimaxAI Chat
Open Chat, pick Opus 4.6, and start with code review or a long agent draft.